Resistance of Serratia marcescens (SPKD15) to various environmental stress conditions: Effect on cell viability and prodiogisin production

  • Pratyush Kumar Das Siksha ‘O’ Anusandhan (Deemed to be University)
  • Smrutipragnya Samal Siksha ‘O’ Anusandhan (Deemed to be University)
  • Ratikanta Sahoo Siksha ‘O’ Anusandhan (Deemed to be University)
  • Prasant Kumar Sabat Siksha ‘O’ Anusandhan (Deemed to be University)
Keywords: Serratia marcescens, Prodiogisin, Environmental stress, Resistance, Antimicrobial


Serratia marcescens, a gram negative bacillus is generally related to hospital acquired infections. Production of red pigment (Prodiogisin) by the bacterium is an important characteristic feature and has been reported to exhibit certain antimicrobial property. The resistance of the bacteria towards several classes of antibiotics makes it one of the most notorious pathogen. The work aimed to evaluate the resistance of Serratia marcescens (SPKD15) under various environmental stress conditions (temperature, pH, Salt concentration and UV). Effect of these stress conditions on the cell viability and production of prodiogisin was analysed. The strain was able to sustain up to temperature of 40°C, Salt (NaCl) concentration of 7%, pH up to 10 and could withstand UV radiations up to 2 minutes. However, the prodiogisin production was negatively affected and finally inhibited at all the conditions of environmental stress(Temperature = 35°C, pH = 4 and 9, Nacl concentration = 4% and UV exposure of 15 seconds). This indicates that prodiogisin may act as a protective mechanism for the bacterium under stress. Further, intracellular antimicrobial was obtained from the UV exposed culture and compared with the antimicrobial obtained from the normal culture. The antimicrobial obtained from UV exposed culture showed decreased antimicrobial effect with inhibition diameter ranging between 2 mm to 13 mm (± S.D) as compared to the antimicrobial obtained from the normal culture. An inhibition diameter ranging between 4 mm to 22 mm (± S.D) was obtained in case of the normal culture which may be attributed to the loss of pigmentation. The study highlights the resistance of the bacterium to various environmental stresses. Keeping the degree of pathogenicity of the bacterium in mind, eradication of the same is quite difficult and must be looked upon seriously.

Author Biographies

Pratyush Kumar Das, Siksha ‘O’ Anusandhan (Deemed to be University)

Centre for Biotechnology,
Siksha ‘O’ Anusandhan (Deemed to be University), Bhubaneswar,
Odisha, India

Smrutipragnya Samal, Siksha ‘O’ Anusandhan (Deemed to be University)

Centre for Biotechnology,
Siksha ‘O’ Anusandhan (Deemed to be University), Bhubaneswar,
Odisha, India

Ratikanta Sahoo, Siksha ‘O’ Anusandhan (Deemed to be University)

Centre for Biotechnology,
Siksha ‘O’ Anusandhan (Deemed to be University), Bhubaneswar,
Odisha, India

Prasant Kumar Sabat, Siksha ‘O’ Anusandhan (Deemed to be University)

School of Pharmaceutical Sciences,
Siksha ‘O’ Anusandhan (Deemed to be University), Bhubaneswar,
Odisha, India


1. Andreeva I.N., Ogorodnikova T.I.; The effect of the cultivation conditions on the growth and pigmentation of Serratia marcescens; ZhMikrobiol Epidemiol Immunobiol.; 1999; Vol. May-Jun (3); 16-20.
2. Aneja K.R.; Experiments in Microbiology, Plant Pathology and Biotechnology. 4thedition. New Delhi: New Age International; 2003. ISBN: 81-224-1494-X
3. Bartlett W.T., O’Donovan G.A., Neff R.D.; Effect of gammaradiation on Serratia marcescens. Studies on the radiosensitivity ofprodigiosin production; Radiation Research; 1970; Vol. 43; 196-203.
4. Bunting M.I; Factors Affecting the Distribution of Color Variants in Ageing Broth Cultures of Serratia marcescens #274; J. Bacteriol.; 1942; Vol. 43; 593-606.
5. Cooksey R.C., Bannister E.R., Farrar Jr. W.E.; Antibiotic Resistance Patterns of Clinical Isolates of Serratia marcescens; Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1975; Vol. 7 No. 4; 396-399.
6. Das P.K., Das S., Sahoo D., Dalei J., Rao V.M., Nayak S., Palo S.; Comparative Evaluation of Purification Methods for Production of Polypeptide Antibiotics – “Polymyxin B” and “Cerexin A” from Bacillus Species; PharmaTutor; 2014; Vol. 2 No. 8; 188-200.
7. Ding M.J. and Williams R.P.; Biosynthesis of prodigiosin by white strains of Serratia marcescens isolated from patients; J. Clin. Microbiol.; 1983; Vol 17; 476-80.
8. Gouin F., Papazian L., Martin C. et al.; A non-comparative study of the efficacy and tolerance of cefepime in combination with amikacin in the treatment of severe infections in patients in intensive care; J AntimicrobChemother; 1993; Vol. 32 Suppl B; 205-214.
9. Hejazi A. and Falkiner F.R.; Serratia marcescens; J. Med. Microbiol.; 1997; Vol 46; 903-912.
11. Hughes B.S., Cullum A.J., Bennett A.F.; An experimental evolutionary study on adaptation to temporally fluctuating pH in Escherichia coli; Physiol. Biochem. Zool.; 2007; Vol. 80 ; 406–421.
12. Ingledew W.M., Sivaswamy G., Burton J.D.; The API 20E microtube system for rapid identification of gram negative brewery bacteria; J. Inst. Brew.; 1980; Vol. 86 (July-August); 165-168.
13. Ketola T.L.,Mikonranta J., Zhang K., Saarinen A.M., Ormala et al.; Fluctuating temperature leads to evolution of thermal generalism and preadaptation to novel environments; Evolution; 2013; Vol. 67 ; 2936–2944.
14. Mills J., Drew D.; Serratia marcescens endocarditis: a regional illness associated with intravenous drug abuse; Ann Intern Med.; 1976; Vol 84; 29-35.
15. Noor R., Islam Z., Munshi S.K., Rahman F.; Influence of Temperature on Escherichia coli Growth in Different Culture Media; J Pure ApplMicrobio.; 2003; Vol. 7 No. 2; 899-904.
16. Rjazantseva I.N., Andreeva I.N., Ogorodnikova T.I.; Effect of various growth conditions on pigmentation of Serratia marcescens. Microbios.; 1994; Vol. 79; 155- 161.
17. Sleigh J.D.; Antibiotic resistance in Serratia marcescens; Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1983; 3 (6406): 1651-1652.
18. Singh R.P., Jha P.N.; The Multifarious PGPR Serratia marcescens CDP-13 Augments Induced Systemic Resistance and Enhanced Salinity Tolerance of Wheat (Triticumaestivum L.); PLoS ONE; 2016; Vol. 11 No. 6; e0155026. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0155026
19. Singlton P. and Sainsbury D.; Dictionare of Microbiology and Molecular Biology. 3rd Edn. Johan Willy and Sons Ltd.
20. Steiner J.J., Poklemba C.J., Fjellstrom R.G. and Elliott L.F.; A rapid one tube genomic DNA extraction process for PCR and RAPD analyses; Nucleic Acids Res.; 1995; Vol. 23; 2569–2570.
21. Webb P.S., Neff R.D., O’Donovan G.A.; Effect of gammaradiation on Serratia marcescens. Comparison of the radiosensitivity of pigmented and nonpigmented cells; Radiation Research; 1971; Vol. 48; 40-52.
22. Wheat R.P., Zuckerman A., Rank L.A.; Infection due to Chromobacteria: report of eleven cases; Arch Intern Med; 1951; Vol. 88; 461-466.
23. Wright E.S., Yilmaz L.S., Noguera D.R.; DECIPHER, A Search-Based Approach to Chimera Identification for 16S rRNA Sequences; Applied and Environmental Microbiology; 2012; Doi:10.1128/AEM.06516-11.
24. Yang H., Cheng J., Hu L., Zhu Y., Li J.; Mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance in Serratia marcescens; Afr. J. Microbiol. Res.; 2012; Vol. 6 No. 21; 4427-4437. Doi: 10.5897/AJMR11.1545.
25. Zion M., Guy D., Yarom R., Slesak M.; UV radiation damage and bacterial DNA repair systems repair; Journal of Biological Education; 2006; Vol. 41 No. 1; 30-33. Doi: 10.1080/00219266.2006.9656054
How to Cite
Das, P.K., Samal, S., Sahoo, R. and Sabat, P.K. 2018. Resistance of Serratia marcescens (SPKD15) to various environmental stress conditions: Effect on cell viability and prodiogisin production. PharmaTutor. 6, 4 (Apr. 2018), 18-26. DOI: